
F1 2027 Engine Changes: Smaller Teams Face Potential Financial Burden, Schiff Warns
Naomi Schiff warns that the FIA's 2027 shift from a nearly 50:50 to a 60:40 ICE/electric split could impose heavy costs on smaller teams and disrupt Audi's entry, while David Coulthard counters that the sport's massive publicity makes it worthwhile.
The FIA has confirmed engine hardware changes for 2027, shifting the power split from near 50:50 to approximately 60:40 between the internal combustion engine and electric power, aiming to make driving "more intuitive." Former W Series driver and Sky Sports analyst Naomi Schiff warns that this late adjustment could create a significant financial burden, particularly for smaller teams and newcomer Audi.
Why it matters:
The rule change comes just as teams have invested billions into development under the original 50:50 framework. Smaller teams, already operating on tighter budgets, face additional costs for chassis adjustments. Audi's entry was predicated on the original split, making this a politically delicate situation for the FIA and the sport's commercial balance.
The details:
- Schiff's concern: "The big manufacturers like Mercedes, Ferrari will have spent hundreds of millions, potentially billions, on development. You would expect a return on that investment in three to four years. But if we go back to designing, does that not have a massive financial impact, not just on the big teams, but particularly the smaller teams who also need to make changes to the chassis?"
- Audi's dilemma: Schiff noted that Audi agreed to join F1 based on the 50:50 split, making the shift a "tricky conversation" politically and financially.
- Coulthard's argument: The former F1 driver countered that the publicity from being on the F1 grid far outweighs the costs. He compared it to Le Mans, where even winning provides a fraction of the exposure. "Whether you're winning or not, you're still gaining a lot of publicity," he said, adding that a Monaco Grand Prix invitation carries far more value for a brand than a Le Mans 24 invite.
Between the lines:
The debate highlights a core tension in F1's regulatory evolution: balancing technological relevance, driving spectacle, and cost control. While the FIA aims to improve the show with a more intuitive power delivery, the financial ripple effects on the grid's smaller players — and on Audi's carefully planned entry — could reshape team dynamics in the coming years. Coulthard's view underscores that F1's global reach may absorb some of the pain, but the immediate burden on team budgets is real.
Don't miss the next lap
Get the deep dives and technical analysis from the world of F1 delivered to your inbox twice a week.
Zero spam. Only high-octane analysis. Unsubscribe anytime.
Join the inner circle
Get the deep dives and technical analysis from the world of F1 delivered to your inbox twice a week.
Zero spam. Only high-octane analysis. Unsubscribe anytime.



